Our People » Tara Pincock
Tara Pincock is the policy counsel at the Open Markets Institute. She advances Open Markets’ antimonopoly work through its amicus program and other forms of legal advocacy. Her scholarship focuses on finding real-world solutions to the many harms created by a lack of fair competition in the marketplace.
Pincock is a former state antitrust enforcer with over ten years of complex litigation experience. As a state antitrust enforcer, she investigated companies in a wide range of industries including tech, hospitality, healthcare, and pharmaceuticals. She was one of the lead attorneys for a coalition of states on the three state antitrust cases against Google. Prior to moving into antitrust law, Pincock worked in private practice where she specialized in securities, bankruptcy, and contract law.
She graduated from S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah in 2013 and has B.S. in finance from the University of Utah. You can reach her at pincock@openmarketsinstitute.org or follow her on Twitter(X) @TaraPincock.
In this issue, we look at one of the first challenges the Trump Administration will face — as ocean freight carriers exploit their monopoly to drive freight rates to unprecedented levels. We also look at the DOJ’s plan to break up Google. In this issue,
Policy counsel Tara Pincock calls for stricter enforcement to ensure that executives face consequences, deterring price-fixing in the future.
The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in Villages v. FTC, one of two cases that challenge the FTC’s landmark prohibition on non-compete clauses.
In this issue, Open Markets policy counsel Tara Pincock — who helped write the original lawsuit against Google — discusses a potential breakup.
In Project Syndicate’s Big Question, Tara Pincock weighs in on the current state of antitrust law, enforcement, and the courts.
Open Markets submitted a comment to the FTC calling for termination of a 2012 Coopharma consent order and urging the agency to endorse an exemption for employees, contractors and small firms that challenge concentrations of power.
Open Markets files amicus brief in algorithmic price-fixing case involving Las Vegas hotels, Gibson v. Cendyn Group.
In this issue, we report from the Virginia courthouse where the DOJ is laying out its case against Google for monopolization of ad tech. And we look at Europe’s fascinating debate on how to rebuild its economy.
The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in two cases currently before the Supreme Court concerning states’ ability to regulate certain companies in the public interest, or as “common carriers”: Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton.
Legal director Sandeep Vaheesan and policy counsel Tara Pincock encourage the public to support the fight of the red states in bringing an important antitrust cause to the Supreme Court.